2010-07-25

Little Differences: London

[Jules and Vincent]This is me, try­ing to record a few off­hand obser­va­tions, and ridicu­lously try to link them to larger social trends and stereo­types, aside from the stuff every­body already knows, e.g. the habit of dri­ving on the wrong side of the road.

Climate Change

Air con­di­tion­ing sim­ply isn’t used as much here in London; the indoors are kept a few degrees (F) warmer than I am used to in Chicago, which has a sim­i­lar (out­doors) climate.

I’d expect that if I stayed here I’d sweat off about 10 lbs just doing stan­dard office work, which could explain how the aver­age frailty here is notice­ably higher.

A Can of Coke

SI mea­sure­ments mean a can of pop is 330ml, which is just shy of 11.2 oz. In the US, it’s a 12oz can. That’s about 12 calo­ries less sugar per-can, which would be another rea­son why peo­ple here are thinner.

Metropolitan

Holy Christ as a cracker.

So here’s the thing: U.S. cities are mostly planned and Cartesian; they’re on a grid. It may not be per­fect, but you can expect big long streets that run the length of the city, cross-streets that cut over, and a few excep­tions that cut diag­o­nally to help you get from A — C with­out going north to B, then over to C. Once and a while, a street will dead-end for some rea­son, and you’ll have to go around the block, or up and over a few to find an under­pass beneath the express­way or avoid a one-way sec­tion of a street.

And for you native Bostonians, I rec­om­mend you come visit your cousins in Chicago and you’ll see what I mean… Hell, even Newark has a grid.

You can also expect the num­bers to count up coher­ently: if I say that Madison and State are (0,0), and I live on 1800 N. Wells, you can fig­ure out pretty eas­ily how to get from Madison and State to my house by glanc­ing at a map. The only infor­ma­tion that isn’t encoded in the address is the X axis of Wells, which means that once I know 2D geom­e­try (which every­one is taught the first year of High School), the only addi­tional cog­ni­tive load required to find my way to any given address is the miss­ing coör­di­nate of the street the address is on. I have to learn that Wells = 200 West, that x = –200. And that’s some­thing you can learn once and never for­get. If I do have to detour for some rea­son, I know that I’ve cut over to Clark, which is 100 West, and can get back most any time I want.

Not so in London, at least Tower Hill, which is where my hotel is. Without some kind of map, it isn’t even pos­si­ble to dis­cern that you’re headed the wrong direc­tion — even Sol has deserted you in your quest. The clos­est ana­logue I can imag­ine is that some mad fiend has turned the heart of a major met­ro­pol­i­tan area into the cul-de-sac hell that is restricted to the sub­urbs in the US.

I’m not say­ing that Hell is wrong, but I can turn left twice and still end up trav­el­ling the same direc­tion, because the streets all curve and stop after a block or two. Just sayin’

This also means that cab­bies here have a tremen­dous racket, as they can legit­i­mately mean­der around a neigh­bor­hood try­ing to find a street which only exists for a block or two. It also means that no mat­ter where you are, where you’re going, or how you’re get­ting there, it will take you about an hour.

Transit Costs

The Underground is 2.3x more expen­sive than the CTA. Yes, things are much more posh, and London is more expen­sive in gen­eral, but it costs me 6 USD, rather than 2.5 USD to get anywhere.

Cheers

“Thanks, you’re a dia­mond, babe” is not some­thing you’d ever hear in the U.S. for let­ting some­one bum a smoke. (Well, maybe Boystown.) I tend to worry that I come across as some­thing of an ogre for the busi­nesslike, give-nothing-away, “thanks” I’m used to. We’re not ass­holes, we just play poker.

Update: If you’re tempted to take offense, please recall these are tongue-in-cheek, touristy obser­va­tions of a con­fessed business-traveling Chicagoan who actu­ally did enjoy him­self, par­tic­u­larly on Brick Road the night before he left. ;-)

Comment on this...


2010-03-21

Thoughts on Privacy

This post is pretty heavy on the pon­tif­i­cat­ing, but I’ll tie it back into GNOME at the end, I swear.

I’ve been think­ing quite a bit about pri­vacy lately. Most of the shiny things here on the inter­net are some type of ser­vice where you aban­don some degree of pri­vacy to an inter­me­di­ary in return for con­ve­nience or com­mu­nity: your blog, Facebook, Twitter, GMail, Amazon​.com, and Last​.fm take much of the ran­dom bits of your life and put them into corporate-owned data­bases so you can con­nect with friends, buy ran­dom things with­out mov­ing, or not have to edit the same silly pref­er­ences dialogs 50 times. OKCupid, Google Latitude and Mint do so with your pec­ca­dil­loes, your phys­i­cal loca­tion, and your finan­cial records.

There’s a cer­tain amount of trust involved in par­tic­i­pat­ing in all this: the trust that your infor­ma­tion is ulti­mately anony­mous or only sold to adver­tis­ers. Of course, Google logs what you’re look­ing for, and every­thing that’s made pub­lic, and it’s worth point­ing out that there’s really noth­ing pre­vent­ing an orga­ni­za­tion from col­lat­ing all this infor­ma­tion together, which is an end to most of what we call pri­vacy and the sense of free­dom that comes along with it. About the only excep­tion is med­ical records, which are pro­tected in the US by pri­vacy laws. My under­stand­ing is that it’s a crime to give unau­tho­rized peo­ple access to those records, but I’m a lit­tle shaky on what hap­pens after that pri­vacy has been breached — that is, once the bribed clerk has given out the records, are there laws to pre­vent the recip­i­ent from dis­trib­ut­ing them further?

Minutiae aside, there’s a larger, unasked ques­tion of the social cost for all this. Does the lack of pri­vacy man­i­fest as a mon­u­men­tal chill­ing effect? Does it turn out after all your activ­i­ties are cat­a­loged and recorded that you’re less free? Do you self-censor and live in fear of being dis­cov­ered, or (I’d say) fool­ishly assume that your pri­vacy is a tra­di­tional social norm that will con­tinue to be respected? Grab a green flag and march against the fact the only real pri­vacy you have is “the two inches inside your own head?”

Whatever the social cost of this new world will turn out to be, we’re liv­ing in it already, and peo­ple are going to have to fig­ure out how to make it com­pat­i­ble with the con­cept of a free soci­ety. Which is why I redesigned my blog to inte­grate the Lifestream word­press plu­gin and dis­play all of my publically-accessible activ­i­ties in one place: the music I’m lis­ten­ing to, the movies I’m watch­ing, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube. I’d actu­ally like it if I could put my Amazon​.com pur­chases on there like Facebook tried to do with­out ask­ing any­one. There’s noth­ing in any of these data­bases that a gov­ern­ment agency, cor­po­ra­tion, or part­ner couldn’t get their hands on if they wanted really to.

I promised I’d tie this back into GNOME at some point: pos­si­bly the most inter­est­ing thing about a project like Zeitgeist is that it puts that record of what you’re doing in a place where you can access it — it doesn’t solve the under­ly­ing con­flict, of course, but it does let you use it for your own purposes.

Be the second to comment on this...


2009-01-25

Every Pop Song On the Radio

I dis­cov­ered a bit from Clay Shirky, talk­ing about how tele­vi­sion was the way post-griminess indus­trial soci­ety chose to cope with free time. Included was the bit that enough time is wasted watch­ing tele­vi­sion to pro­duce all of Wikipedia 2000 times over.

Comment on this...


2008-05-15

FIY

It’s prob­a­bly worth not­ing at this point that there are a few lessons to the debian OpenSSL débâcle:

  1. There is now a corol­lary to “do not write your own cryp­to­graphic rou­tines”: “do not fix bugs in some­one else’s cryp­to­graphic rou­tines.” If there is a anno­tated view of the OpenSSL tree (I don’t know/don’t care), the DD who patched OpenSSL would have been bet­ter off con­tact­ing the per­son who wrote the offend­ing line in the orig­i­nal source than try­ing to find the cor­rect channel.
  2. Developers must pub­lish cor­rect infor­ma­tion on how to con­tact them. Incorrect infor­ma­tion on the OpenSSL web­site main­te­nance is just as much to blame for this as the DD in ques­tion, who did ask the sug­gested chan­nels about his patch.
  3. Distros should have peer review of patches in security-critical code — by expe­ri­enced devel­op­ers — if they do not already.
  4. Rather than all the bitch­ing, remem­ber that the cen­tral tenet of F/LOSS is Fix It Yourself. This does not cease to apply sim­ply because the prob­lem exists in some­thing you depend on. If any­thing, it should empha­size how nec­es­sary it is.

Comment on this...


2008-04-10

The Life of an Admin for Me

Something to say…

$ history|awk '{a[$2]++ } END{for(i in a){print a[i] " " i}}'|sort -rn|head
184 svn
165 ls
101 cd
96 ldapsearch
95 ssh
62 vim
25 ping
24 grep
23 sudo
20 rm

Be the second to comment on this...


2008-04-07

Inbox Zero

So frig­gin’ sweet to finally get there.

Comment on this...


2008-04-06

Credit Where Due

Thank you to the Sci-Fi Channel (and/or who­ever ends up own­ing them) for get­ting it and let­ting me down­load BSG off your web­site in a flash thing.

Also, Scott Ian is the moth­er­fuckin’ man, though I think Baltar is very clearly sup­posed to be a Factured Fairlytales ver­sion of Jesus (the beard was the giv­away, I thought). :-)

Update: Turns out Sci-Fi is owned by NBC Universal, who in turn is owned by GE (80%) and Vivendi (20%).

Be the first to comment on this...


2008-04-05

Middleman Solutions

It seems like most of the solu­tions at spam are tar­geted at the trans­port of the spam, just as the solu­tions to drugs were tar­geted at the “inter­dic­tion” of drugs com­ing into the U.S. thirty years ago.

Be the first to comment on this...


2008-04-02

Insomnia

I’m cur­rently suf­fer­ing from putting my insom­nia to good use (so far I’ve installed Tracks), so I’ll take the time to post some ran­dom thoughts:

  • I was bit­ten by April Fools twice today. The sec­ond time because I was too exhausted to remem­ber that it was April Fools.
  • A life with­out hope is not wasted or a pity any more than a life with­out reli­gion is.
  • A good friend of mine once told me that if you lis­ten to what peo­ple say care­fully, they will give them­selves away at some point. Like most wis­dom phrased in an open-ended way, I’ve seen lots of con­fir­ma­tion of this and lit­tle contradiction.
  • I think a fair num­ber of peo­ple like to dom­i­nate oth­ers with their words. Being on the receiv­ing end of that kind of thing is really exhaust­ing. I think it’s fairly obvi­ously just peo­ple play­ing out their psy­chodra­mas in an envi­ron­ment where you can’t just club and be clubbed.
  • State-granted monop­o­lies on cul­ture, art, and media in gen­eral sti­fle cre­ativ­ity, limit free­dom, and exist to pro­tect one power against another. In this soci­ety it’s almost always used to pro­tect the estab­lished power against the new one. Standard Lessig, now apply it to those orga­ni­za­tions we may oth­er­wise sup­port. That pinched-face dis­com­fort you are feel­ing is cog­ni­tive dis­so­nance between your stated pref­er­ences and your desire to defend your principles.

Be the first to comment on this...


2007-12-31

Style and Substance

Point
Counter-point

Be the first to comment on this...

Go backward in time