2009-11-22

Scratching The Itch

It’s been said before, but a person’s first foray into free cul­ture of any type is often to scratch an itch. For me, my first Wikipedia edit was undo­ing van­dal­ism on the Hernando de Soto Polar page con­flat­ing him with the con­quis­ta­dor of the same name — replac­ing his actual birth date with 1500-something, etc.

It’s some­what dis­ap­point­ing that real Wikipedia van­dal­ism is as point­lessly child­ish as that…

Be the second to comment on this...


2009-01-25

Every Pop Song On the Radio

I dis­cov­ered a bit from Clay Shirky, talk­ing about how tele­vi­sion was the way post-griminess indus­trial soci­ety chose to cope with free time. Included was the bit that enough time is wasted watch­ing tele­vi­sion to pro­duce all of Wikipedia 2000 times over.

Comment on this...


2008-04-06

Credit Where Due

Thank you to the Sci-Fi Channel (and/or who­ever ends up own­ing them) for get­ting it and let­ting me down­load BSG off your web­site in a flash thing.

Also, Scott Ian is the moth­er­fuckin’ man, though I think Baltar is very clearly sup­posed to be a Factured Fairlytales ver­sion of Jesus (the beard was the giv­away, I thought). :-)

Update: Turns out Sci-Fi is owned by NBC Universal, who in turn is owned by GE (80%) and Vivendi (20%).

Be the first to comment on this...


2008-04-02

Insomnia

I’m cur­rently suf­fer­ing from putting my insom­nia to good use (so far I’ve installed Tracks), so I’ll take the time to post some ran­dom thoughts:

  • I was bit­ten by April Fools twice today. The sec­ond time because I was too exhausted to remem­ber that it was April Fools.
  • A life with­out hope is not wasted or a pity any more than a life with­out reli­gion is.
  • A good friend of mine once told me that if you lis­ten to what peo­ple say care­fully, they will give them­selves away at some point. Like most wis­dom phrased in an open-ended way, I’ve seen lots of con­fir­ma­tion of this and lit­tle contradiction.
  • I think a fair num­ber of peo­ple like to dom­i­nate oth­ers with their words. Being on the receiv­ing end of that kind of thing is really exhaust­ing. I think it’s fairly obvi­ously just peo­ple play­ing out their psy­chodra­mas in an envi­ron­ment where you can’t just club and be clubbed.
  • State-granted monop­o­lies on cul­ture, art, and media in gen­eral sti­fle cre­ativ­ity, limit free­dom, and exist to pro­tect one power against another. In this soci­ety it’s almost always used to pro­tect the estab­lished power against the new one. Standard Lessig, now apply it to those orga­ni­za­tions we may oth­er­wise sup­port. That pinched-face dis­com­fort you are feel­ing is cog­ni­tive dis­so­nance between your stated pref­er­ences and your desire to defend your principles.

Be the first to comment on this...


2007-12-31

Style and Substance

Point
Counter-point

Be the first to comment on this...


2007-02-25

Fixing the Internets

Stealing fromA mashup of Sadly, No! and Slashdot

Join The Blackshirts

Defend the Homeland

Mussolini for President, 2008

Be the first to comment on this...


2007-01-22

Rethinking Moderation

So Slipshod Slashdot has a story up on a Chinese cryp­tog­ra­pher who found a short­cut through the SHA-1 scheme two years ago. While I’m not a cryp­tog­ra­pher, it appears to be eas­ier to forge mes­sages or crack hashed pass­words which use the SHA-1 algo­rithm. Unfortunately, even read­ing the com­ments at +5 puts the num­ber of com­ments at 40, includ­ing the same dumb-assed argu­ments about gun control/gun rights that you sim­ply can­not avoid when you stick Libertarians and Liberals (sounds like an RPG to me) in the same room. Shorter: Bullshit about Censorship and Gun-control and Tha Gubment and The Constitution have invaded +5, and since the goal of the point-based mod­er­a­tion sys­tem is to save the time of peo­ple who don’t care to wade through the same “legal­ize it!” v. “crim­i­nal!” argu­ments on threads about hash­ing algo­rithm secu­rity, it should be evi­dent that it has has failed.

So, why not extend or remove the upper lim­its on the mod­er­a­tion points, and add an option to only show the top n com­ments and replies to them? That is, at least, more con­sis­tent with why I use mod­er­a­tion (to save time).

Be the second to comment on this...


2006-11-27

Slide

Thoggen

Cool lit­tle shot of back­ing up a DVD in Ubuntu via Thoggen.

Comment on this...


2006-05-03

Backdated

“It’s not enough that you sell your wak­ing life for min­i­mum wage, but they get your dreams for free”

Monday night, I had my first C# dream.

I later dreamed I ran into an old friend of mine from High School, who I haven’t thought of recently. Charcoal grey and white tiling, just pass­ing her by, until I noticed who she was. She smiled at me, and I acted all geeked to see her, but that was it.

Both Monday and Tuesday I ended up putting in over nine hours of actual legit­i­mate work, plus about a half-hour worth of breaks. Combine that with the two hour dri­ves and the wakeup, and I end up flush­ing 13 hours of my day to some igno­rant fuck that not only has no con­cep­tion of what I do for a liv­ing, but fol­lows it up with the belief that 35k a year is too much for me to be paid. I got “talked to” for report­ing my over­time this after­noon, so I took off early and

The trans­par­ent “blah­blah­blah” bull­shit is start­ing to get to me too, watch­ing some­one else’s sales guys try to talk shit, and my boss try to return the serve, when I could be doing use­ful work instead really gets under my skin. Like I don’t have enough to do with­out hav­ing to spend an hour sub­merged in lies for profit.

So yes­ter­day night rolls around, and I spend it with a girl I used to date… obvi­ously because I’m a glut­ton for pun­ish­ment. That lit­tle exer­cise in soul-immolation set me back about three months, but I was sur­prised how quickly I’ve rebounded: I had reached the “fuck the world” level of frus­tra­tion by the time I was dri­ving home today. Last time around it took me about a month and a half of worldly bull­shit to reach that level of pissed-off.

This week I also real­ized the true mean­ing of the Statue of Liberty: a chick with a torch backed up by a peas­ant mob. Rock.

Lastly, I looked into Second Life… and dis­coved it’s essen­tially an an anarcho-capitalist vision of this life. Lots of drug-inspired cos­tumes and body mod­i­fi­ca­tion crammed into a mon­u­men­tal fuck­ing shop­ping mall.

Be the first to comment on this...


2006-01-14

Finding Spivak

I recently IM’d some­one who sounded inter­est­ing on an unnamed quiz/dating site, and was pleas­antly sur­prised to find some­one who made me feel dumb. Not that feel­ing dumb is good, just that it’s eas­ier to see the next plateau when there’s some­one there wav­ing at you.

Unfortunately, reach­ing that plateau involves track­ing down a par­tic­u­lar essay by Gayatri Spivak, pro­fes­sor of Post-colonial Studies at Columbia University. The essay itself is from 1988 1985, and it’s not on the web anywhere.

Which is the real mes­sage to pro­fes­sors every­where: if you want your writ­ing to be read by peo­ple other than your­self, your col­legues, and your grant com­mit­tees, please put them online, for free. Yes, Chomsky has a cadre of fan­boys to do such things for him (or at least, that’s my under­stand­ing), but he is also prac­tic­ing what he preaches regard­ing the respon­si­bil­i­ties of intel­lec­tu­als. He may have a cushier job than most aca­d­e­mics, but to my mind that sim­ply means that you should spend a few hours a week wrestling with a com­puter instead of, for exam­ple, a kiln or bag­gie of psy­clotrop­ics. Make web design/publishing your hobby until you get decent at it, then put your shit online so any­one with a net­work hookup or a lap­top can read it.

What I’ve man­aged to glean from reviews of Spivak tends to mir­ror my thoughts any­ways. As a bit of back­ground, I was intro­duced to rad­i­cal pol­i­tics through black nation­al­ism and white anti-racism, so what she’s quoted as say­ing regard­ing the essay doesn’t seem to be any­thing open for debate — par­tic­u­larly regard­ing those known within civil rights his­to­ries as “white lib­er­als,” and their inabil­ity to speak for any­one but them­selves. White peo­ple telling every­one else what they need to be doing, osten­si­bly for every­one else’s ben­e­fit. Where have we heard this bull­shit before? (Hint: It’s the same old racist “White Man’s Burden” that under­girded the whole global colo­nial enter­prise.) White rev­o­lu­tion­ists (love that term, Emma) can’t tell every­one else how to run their rev­o­lu­tion. Yeah, no shit.

But any­ways, with­out get­ting my hands on an actual copy of the damned essay, any read­ing I can come up with is just me rant­ing and rav­ing out of my ass, by turn, so to all you pro­fes­sors: put your stuff online so peo­ple like me can grok it, mmmkay? :-)

Seriously, if you got into acad­e­mia for the money, you really fucked up some­where — prob­a­bly in think­ing that some­thing with zero repro­duc­tion cost can (or should) be commodified.

Be the first to comment on this...

Go backward in time